The NARA document on authenticity (1994)

Preamble

1. We, the experts assembled in Nara (Japan), wish to acknowledge the generous spirit and intellectual courage of the Japanese authorities in providing a timely forum in which we could challenge conventional thinking in the conservation field, and debate ways and means of broadening our horizons to bring greater respect for cultural and heritage diversity to conservation practice.

2. We also wish to acknowledge the value of the framework for discussion provided by the World Heritage Committee's desire to apply the test of authenticity in ways which accord full respect to the social and cultural values of all societies, in examining the outstanding universal value of cultural properties proposed for the World Heritage List.

3. The Nara Document on Authenticity is conceived in the spirit of the Charter of Venice, 1964, and builds on it and extends it in response to the expanding scope of cultural heritage concerns and interests in our contemporary world.

4. In a world that is increasingly subject to the forces of globalization and homogenization, and in a world in which the search for cultural identity is sometimes pursued through aggressive nationalism and the suppression of the cultures of minorities, the essential contribution made by the consideration of authenticity in conservation practice is to clarify and illuminate the collective memory of humanity.

Cultural Diversity and Heritage Diversity

5. The diversity of cultures and heritage in our world is an irreplaceable source of spiritual and intellectual richness for all humankind. The protection and enhancement of cultural and heritage diversity in our world should be actively promoted as an essential aspect of human development.

6. Cultural heritage diversity exists in time and space, and demands respect for other cultures and all aspects of their belief systems. In cases where cultural values appear to be in conflict, respect for cultural diversity demands acknowledgment of the legitimacy of the cultural values of all parties.

7. All cultures and societies are rooted in the particular forms and means of tangible and intangible expression which constitute their heritage, and these should be respected.

8. It is important to underline a fundamental principle of UNESCO, to the effect that the cultural heritage of each is the cultural heritage of all. Responsibility for cultural heritage and the management of it belongs, in the first place, to the cultural community that has generated it, and subsequently to that which cares for it. However, in addition to these responsibilities, adherence to the international charters and conventions developed for conservation of cultural heritage also obliges consideration of the principles and responsibilities flowing from them. Balancing their own requirements with those of other cultural communities is, for each community, highly desirable, provided achieving this balance does not undermine their fundamental cultural values.

Values and authenticity

9. Conservation of cultural heritage in all its forms and historical periods is rooted in the values attributed to the heritage. Our ability to understand these values depends, in part, on the degree to which information sources about these values may be understood as credible or truthful. Knowledge and understanding of these sources of information, in relation to original and subsequent characteristics of the cultural heritage, and their meaning, is a requisite basis for assessing all aspects of authenticity.

10. Authenticity, considered in this way and affirmed in the Charter of Venice, appears as the essential qualifying factor concerning values. The understanding of authenticity plays a fundamental role in all scientific studies of the cultural heritage, in conservation and restoration planning, as well as within the inscription procedures used for the World Heritage Convention and other cultural heritage inventories.

11. All judgements about values attributed to cultural properties as well as the credibility of related information sources may differ from culture to culture, and even within the same culture. It is thus not possible to base judgements of values and authenticity within fixed criteria. On the contrary, the respect due to all cultures requires that heritage properties must considered and judged within the cultural contexts to which they belong.

12. Therefore, it is of the highest importance and urgency that, within each culture, recognition be accorded to the specific nature of its heritage values and the credibility and truthfulness of related information sources.

13. Depending on the nature of the cultural heritage, its cultural context, and its evolution through time, authenticity judgements may be linked to the worth of a great variety of sources of information. Aspects of the sources may include form and design, materials and substance, use and function, traditions and techniques, location and setting, and spirit and feeling, and other internal and external factors. The use of these sources permits elaboration of the specific artistic, historic, social, and scientific dimensions of the cultural heritage being examined.

Appendix 1

Suggestions for follow-up (proposed by H. Stovel)

1. Respect for cultural and heritage diversity requires conscious efforts to avoid imposing mechanistic formulae or standardized procedures in attempting to define or determine authenticity of particular monuments and sites.

2. Efforts to determine authenticity in a manner respectful of cultures and heritage diversity requires approaches which encourage cultures to develop analytical processes and tools specific to their nature and needs. Such approaches may have several aspects in common:
- efforts to ensure assessment of authenticity involve multidisciplinary collaboration and the appropriate utilisation of all available expertise and knowledge;
- efforts to ensure attributed values are truly representative of a culture and the diversity of its interests, in particular monuments and sites;
- efforts to document clearly the particular nature of authenticity for monuments and sites as a practical guide to future treatment and monitoring;
- efforts to update authenticity assessments in light of changing values and circumstances.

3. Particularly important are efforts to ensure that attributed values are respected, and that their determination included efforts to build, ad far as possible, a multidisciplinary and community consensus concerning these values.

4. Approaches should also build on and facilitate international co-operation among all those with an interest in conservation of cultural heritage, in order to improve global respect and understanding for the diverse expressions and values of each culture.

5. Continuation and extension of this dialogue to the various regions and cultures of the world is a prerequisite to increasing the practical value of consideration of authenticity in the conservation of the common heritage of humankind.

6. Increasing awareness within the public of this fundamental dimension of heritage is an absolute necessity in order to arrive at concrete measures for safeguarding the vestiges of the past. This means developing greater understanding of the values represented by the cultural properties themselves, as well as respecting the role such monuments and sites play in contemporary society.

Appendix II

Definitions
Conservation: all efforts designed to understand cultural heritage, know its history and meaning, ensure its material safeguard and, as required, its presentation, restoration and enhancement. (Cultural heritage is understood to include monuments, groups of buildings and sites of cultural value as defined in article one of the World Heritage Convention).

Information sources: all material, written, oral and figurative sources which make it possible to know the nature, specifications, meaning and history of the cultural heritage.

The Nara Document on Authenticity was drafted by the 45 participants at the Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, held at Nara, Japan, from 1-6 November 1994, at the invitation of the Agency for Cultural Affairs (Government of Japan) and the Nara Prefecture. The Agency organized the Nara Conference in cooperation with UNESCO, ICCROM and ICOMOS. This final version of the Nara Document has been edited by the general rapporteurs of the Nara Conference, Mr. Raymond Lemaire and Mr. Herb Stovel.

Tlaxcala Declaration on the Revitalization of Small Settlements (1982)

The participants attending the third Inter-American Symposium on the Conservation of the Building Heritage devoted to the subject of "The Revitalization of Small Settlements", organized by the Mexican National Committee of ICOMOS and held in Trinidad, Tlaxcala, from 25 to 28 October 1982, wish to express their gratitude to the representatives of Mexico and the organizing committee for the very kind way they have been received and express their satisfaction at the high standard of the proceedings and at the results achieved.

They wish most particularly to thank the government of the state of Tlaxcala for its hospitality and are happy to observe the efforts it is making to preserve the architectural and urban heritage entrusted to its keeping by history, which is of extreme interest to all the peoples of America.

The delegates, after examining the situation now prevailing in America from the point of view of the dangers which threaten the architectural and environmental inheritance of the small settlements, decide to adopt the following conclusions:

1a. They reassert that the small settlements are repositories of ways of living which bear witness to our cultures, retain the scale appropriate to them and at the same time personify the community relations which give inhabitants an identity.

2a. They reaffirm that the conservation and rehabilitation of small settlements is a moral obligation and a responsibility for the government of each state and for the local authorities and that their communities have a right to share in the making of decisions on the conservation of their town or village and to take part directly in the work of carrying them out.

3a. As established by the Charter of Chapultepec, and as reflected in the concern expressed at the Morelia Symposium and at other meetings of American practical conservationists, the environmental and architectural heritage of small settlements is a non-renewable resource and their conservation calls for carefully developed procedures which will ensure that they run no risk of being impaired or distorted for reasons of political expediency.

4a. They agree that initiatives for the purpose of securing the well-being of the communities living in small settlements must have their basis in strict respect for the traditions of the places concerned and their specific ways of life. They also agree that the situation of economic crisis at present affecting the continent must not restrict efforts to preserve the identity of the small settlements; on the contrary, if such difficult circumstances are to be overcome, reliance must be placed in the cultural achievements of the past and in the material forms of expression of our collective memory.

5a. They further observe that the introduction of patterns of consumption and behaviour foreign to our traditions, which make their way in via the multiple communications media, assist the destruction of the cultural heritage by encouraging contempt for our own values, especially in the small settlements; they therefore urge governments, institutes of higher education and public or private bodies interested in the Preservation of the heritage to use the media at their disposal for the countering of the effects of this process.

6a. They reassert the importance of regional planning as a means of combating the process of desertion of the small settlements and progressive overpopulation of medium-sized and large towns - a phenomenon which strikes at the very existence of the said settlements. And they point out that any action designed to preserve the urban setting and the architectural qualities of a place must essentially be a fight for the improvement of its population's socio-economic conditions and of the quality of life in its urban centres. They therefore appeal to governments and to competent bodies to provide a suitably integrated infrastructure together with the practical equipment for the arresting of the depopulation of small settlements.

7a. They consider that if the traditional environment of the rural settlements and small towns is to be preserved, and if there is to be continuity of expression in contemporary vernacular architecture, traditional materials and techniques must remain available, and they propose that, where these cannot be found, substitutes be used which do not involve any marked impairment of the visual effects and which meet the requirements both of the local physical and geographical conditions and of the way of life of the population.

Recommendations:

Those attending the Symposium reassert the principles which inspire the work of the International Council on Monuments and Sites, as laid down in miscellaneous international texts, including the recommendations made at the meetings held previously in America, at Quito, Chapultepec and Morelia, concerning the conservation of small settlements, and adopt in their turn the following recommendations for circulation by the ICOMOS Committees in America and by any other specialists and for submission to the authorities, the professional associations, the institutes competent in the field concerned and the universities, schools of architecture and other bodies.

It is recommended:

1. That any initiative with a view to the conservation and revitalization of small settlements must be designed as a part of a programme embracing the historical, anthropological, social and economic aspects of the area and the possibilities for its revitalization, failing which it would be fated to be superficial and ineffectual.

2. That encouragement be given to interdisciplinary participation as an essential prerequisite of any effort in favour of the conservation, restoration and revitalization of small settlements.

3. That the public services administrations concerned with such things as communication, health, education, electrification, etc., should be duly conscious of the fact that their activities undertaken with the best of intentions can on the contrary cause harm to small communities if they are ignorant of, or fail to appreciate, the values of the cultural heritage and the benefits deriving from the conservation of that heritage for the community as a whole.

4. That if better results are to be achieved both in national policies and in specific legislation and in technical progress, the sharing of experience in a variety of areas is essential. Information, whether of an international nature or specifically relating to the American world, is most important. Emphasis is laid once again on the utility of publications designed for the purpose, and it is proposed that American working groups be set up on the various individual subjects involved.

5. That the use of regional materials and the preservation of the local traditional building techniques are essential to satisfactory conservation of small settlements and do not conflict with the general principle that any new work should bear the mark of our age. It is urgent that an effort be made to recognize and enhance the prestige and value inherent in the use of such materials and techniques where they exist, and to keep them alive with increasing forcefulness in the minds of the communities concerned. It is recommended that encouragement be given to proficiency in the skilled building trades in the form of awards and prizes.

6. That the governments of the Latin American countries consider as in the public interest the granting of funds for the acquisition, maintenance, conservation and restoration of dwellings in small settlements and the lesser towns, as a practical means of keeping alive the building heritage and the housing possibilities it affords. For this purpose there must be amendment of the norms governing the allocation of funds to enable buildings for which vernacular techniques and materials have been used to be eligible for mortgage loans.

7. That schools of architecture should institute and maintain M. A. degrees in restoration and doctorates of restoration and assign due importance in their basic training syllabuses to appreciation of the architectural and town-planning heritage, conservation and restoration problems, and knowledge both of vernacular architecture and of traditional building techniques, to enable their graduates to fit usefully in their professional capacity into the communities requiring their services.

8. That the recognized colleges and societies of architects should set up commissions for the preservation of architectural heritage capable of promoting improved awareness of the responsibility devolving on them for the maintenance of the small settlements, of compiling and circulating information on this problem and of recommending programmes and operations to this end.

9. That the representatives of the countries in the region make every effort to have their governments, if they have not yet done so, approve the Protocol to the UNESCO World Heritage Convention (16 November 1972), so as to be eligible for the support and technical assistance of the international bodies.

The undersigned certify the authenticity of the present text, to be known as the "Declaration of Tlaxcala", which contains the conclusions and recommendations approved at la Trinidad, on 28 October 1982, by the plenary session of the third Inter-American Symposium on the Conservation of the Building Heritage.

First Brazilian Seminar about the Preservation and Revitalization of Historic Centers; Itaipava - 1987

ICOMOS Brazilian Committee, Itaipava, July 1987

BASIC PRINCIPLES

I

Urban historical sites may be considered as those spaces where manifold evidences of the city's cultural production concentrate. They are to be circumscribed rather in terms of their operational value as "critical areas" than in opposition to the city's non-historical places, since the city in its totality is a historical entity.

II

Urban historical sites are part of a wider totality, comprising the natural and the built environment and the everyday living experience of their dwellers as well. Within this wider space, enriched with values of remote or recent origin and permanently undergoing a dynamic process of successive transformations, new urban spaces may be considered as environmental evidences in their formative stages.

III

As a socially produced cultural expression the city adds rather than subtracts. Built space, thus, is the physical result of a social productive process. Its replacement is not justified unless its socio-cultural potentialities are proven exhausted. Evaluation standards for replacement convenience should take into account the socio-cultural costs of the new environment.

IV

The main purpose of preservation is the maintenance and enhancement of reference patterns needed for the expression and consolidation of citizenship. It is through the outlook of the citizen's political appropriation of urban space that preservation may contribute to improve life quality.

V

Considering that one of the characteristics of urban historical sites is their manifold functions, their preservation should not take place at the expense of severe use limitations, even when the allowed uses are of the kind referred to as cultural. They should, in fact, necessarily shelter both the universes of work and of everyday life, through which the more authentic expressions of society's heterogeneity and plurality are brought out. Concerning this heterogeneity, and taking into account the evident housing shortage in Brazil, housing should be the main function of built space. Consequently, the permanence of residents and of traditional activities in urban historical sites, when compatible with those sites, deserves special attention.

VI

The preservation of urban historical sites must be one of the basic aims of urban planning, seen as a continuous and permanent process, supported by a proper understanding of those mechanisms that generate and influence the formation of spatial structures.

VII

The preservation of urban historical sites demands the integrated action of federal, state and local entities, and also the participation of the community concerned with planning decisions as part of the full exercise of citizenship. In this sense it is essential to favor and encourage institutional mechanisms assuring a democratic management of the city through a strengthened participation of civilian leadership.

VIII

Within the preservation process of urban historical sites and as part of the analysis and evaluation of prevailing conditions, inventories are basic tools leading to a better knowledge of cultural and natural property. The participation of the community in inventorying is revealing as to the value it attaches to the property relevant and stimulates its concern as regards such property.

IX

Legal protection of urban historical sites is to be achieved through different procedures, such as cataloging, inventorying, urbanistic regulations, tax exemptions and incentives, listing as to cultural interest and expropriation.

X

Accompanying the diversification of protective procedures, it is essential that the social value of urban property be made to prevail over its market value.

La charte d'Appleton pour la protection et la mise en valeur de l'environnement bati - 1983

Publiée par le comité anglophone d' ICOMOS Canada
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Août 1983

A. Préambule

L'existence de la présente charte est étroitement reliée à la reconnaisance de la Charte internationale sur la conservation et la restauration des monuments et des sites (Venise 1964), la Charte pour la conservation des sites d'importance culturelle (Charte de Burra, ICOMOS Australie, 23 février 1981) et la Charte pour la conservation du patrimoine québécois (Déclaration de Deschambault).

La charte reconnaît également que la gestion saine de l'environnement bâti constitue une activité culturelle importante et que la conservation est un élément essentiel du processus de gestion.

B. Cadre

L'intervention au sein de l'environnement bâti peut se manifester à plusieurs niveaux (de la conservation au redéveloppement), sur plusieurs échelles (d'un élément de bâtiment à l'ensemble d'un site) et se caractérise par une ou plusieurs activités allant de l'entretien à une addition.

Bien qu'un projet puisse combiner divers niveaux, échelles et activités, les projets doivent être définis par des objectifs bien précis en fonction desquels les décisions à petite échelle peuvent se mesurer.

Pour décider du niveau approprié d'intervention, une étude approfondie des qualités suivantes s'impose :

importance culturelle
état et intégrité de la structure
valeur contextuelle
utilisation appropriée des ressources matérielles, sociales et économiques disponibles.

Les décisions concernant l'importance relative de ces facteurs doivent résulter d'un consensus aussi large que possible. Un consensus légitime nécessite la participation du public et doit précéder le début des travaux.

Les rapports entre les échelles, niveaux et activités d'intervention sont résumés ci-après.

Activités

Niveaux d'intervention:	Entretien	Stab.	Enlèvement	Addition
Conservation	x	x
Restauration	x	x	x	x
Réhabilitation	x	x	x	x
Reconstruction				x
Redéveloppement				x

Échelles d'intervention

Niveaux d'intervention:	Partie d'édifice	Édifices	Ensembles	Édifices & zone protect.	Sites
Conservation	x	x	x	x	x
Restauration	x	x	x	x	x
Réhabilitation	x	x	x	x	x
Reconstruction	x	x	x	x	x
Redéveloppement	x	x	x	x	x

Niveaux d'intervention

Conservation :

Maintien des formes et des matériaux existants, et de l'intégrité du site.

Restauration :

Rétablissement des formes et des matériaux anciens, et de l'intégrité du site.

Réhabilitation :

Modification d'un bien selon des normes contemporaines, ce qui peut entraîner une adaptation du bien à un nouvel usage.

Reconstruction :

Reconstitution des biens disparus ou irréversiblement détériorés.

Redéveloppement :

Insertion de structures ou d'additions contemporaines compatibles avec le site.

Activités

Entretien :

- Activité constante pour assurer la longévité du bien sans intervenir de façon irréversible ou dommageable.

Stabilisation :

- Activité périodique destinée à stopper la détérioration et à équilibrer les formes et les matériaux existants avec un minimum de modifications.

Enlèvement :

- Activité périodique qui modifie le bien par le retranchement de surfaces, de couches, de volumes ou d'éléments.

Addition :

Activité périodique qui modifie le bien par l'addition de nouveaux matériaux.

C. Principes

Le respect de la structure est essentiel aux activités de protection et de mise en valeur.

Le processus de protection et de mise en valeur doit tenir compte de toutes les personnes intéressées et faire appel à tous les domaines d'expertise susceptibles de contribuer à l'étude et à la sauvegarde d'un bien.

Les mesures appuyant la protection et la mise en valeur de l'environnement bâti lors d'interventions effectuées aux échelles, niveaux et activités décrits plus haut, exigent l'adhésion aux principes suivants:

Protection :
La protection peut nécessiter la stabilisation; elle doit comprendre un programme d'entretien constant.

Valeur des artefacts :
Les sites de grande importance culturelle doivent être considérés avant tout comme des artefacts et doivent être protégés en tant que monuments historiques fragiles et complexes.

Sites :
Tout élément de l'environnement bâti est indissociable de l'histoire dont il témoigne et du site où il se trouve. Par conséquent, toute intervention doit s'adresser à l'ensemble autant qu'aux parties.

Déménagement :
Le déménagement et le démembrement d'un bien ne doivent être effectués qu'en dernier ressort, si aucun autre moyen ne peut en assurer la protection.

Mise en valeur :
Le retranchement ou l'addition d'éléments caractérisent les mesures qui appuient la mise en valeur d'un bien culturel.

Utilisation :
Le bien doit être utilisé pour les fins auxquelles il a été originellement destiné. Si cela s'avère impossible, des efforts doivent être faits pour trouver des fonctions compatibles exigeant un minimum de modifications. Lorsqu'une nouvelle utilisation est envisagée, il faut d'abord respecter le plan original de circulation et de distribution des espaces.

Additions :
Les nouveaux besoins ou les nouvelles utilisations peuvent exiger l'emploi de nouveaux volumes, matériaux ou finis. Ils doivent également refléter les idées contemporaines tout en respectant et en mettant en valeur l'esprit du bien original.

Climatisation :
Les systèmes d'isolation, de climatisation et autres services doivent être améliorés de façon à respecter l'harmonie existante et traditionnelle du bien, sans toutefois engendrer des processus de détérioration.

D. Pratique

Documentation :

Plus un bien est compris et interprété, plus il est protégé et mis en valeur.

Pour bien comprendre et interpréter un site, il faut rechercher toutes les qualités qui donnent à un bien son importance. Cette activité doit précéder les travaux sur le chantier.

La documentation et les relevés doivent faire partie des travaux de chantier.

Conjecture :

Les activités qui nécessitent le rétablissement ou la reconstitution de formes anciennes doivent se limiter aux formes qui peuvent être exécutées sans conjecture.

Distinction :

Une inspection minutieuse ou un oeil averti doit pouvoir distinguer les nouveaux travaux, mais ceux-ci ne doivent pas altérer l'intégrité esthétique ou la cohérence de l'ensemble.

Matériaux et techniques :

Les matériaux et les techniques utilisées doivent respecter les pratiques traditionnelles, à moins qu'il ait été prouvé scientifiquement que les substituts modernes sont plus avantageux.

Patine :

La patine fait partie de l'intégrité historique d'un bien, et sa destruction ne doit être admise que lorsqu'elle est essentielle à la protection des constituants. Il faut éviter de créer un patine artificielle.

Réversibilité :

Il est toujours préférable d'utiliser des techniques réversibles pour permettre un plus grand choix de développements futurs ou de corrections en cas de problèmes imprévus, ou lorsque l'intégrité du bien risque d'être affectée.

Intégrité :

L'intégrité structurale et technologique du bien doit être respectée et nécessite de l'attention tant au niveau de l'exécution qu'au niveau de l'apparence.

The NARA document on authenticity (1994)

Preamble

Cultural Diversity and Heritage Diversity

Values and authenticity

Tlaxcala Declaration on the Revitalization of Small Settlements (1982)

First Brazilian Seminar about the Preservation and Revitalization of Historic Centers; Itaipava - 1987

La charte d'Appleton pour la protection et la mise en valeur de l'environnement bati - 1983

A. Préambule

B. Cadre

Activités

C. Principes

D. Pratique

Documentation :

Conjecture :

Distinction :

Matériaux et techniques :

Patine :

Réversibilité :

Intégrité :

En poursuivant votre navigation, vous acceptez le dépôt de cookies permettant la mémorisation de vos informations de connexion, la personnalisation des contenus, l’affichage des vidéos et la mesure d’audience. Aucun cookie ne sert à vous pister à des fins commerciales ou publicitaires.

ICOMOS
Termes et conditions d’utilisation des témoins de navigateurs, ou « cookies »

The NARA document on authenticity (1994)

Preamble

Cultural Diversity and Heritage Diversity

Values and authenticity

Tlaxcala Declaration on the Revitalization of Small Settlements (1982)

First Brazilian Seminar about the Preservation and Revitalization of Historic Centers; Itaipava - 1987

La charte d'Appleton pour la protection et la mise en valeur de l'environnement bati - 1983

A. Préambule

B. Cadre

Activités

C. Principes

D. Pratique

Documentation :

Conjecture :

Distinction :

Matériaux et techniques :

Patine :

Réversibilité :

Intégrité :

En poursuivant votre navigation, vous acceptez le dépôt de cookies permettant la mémorisation de vos informations de connexion, la personnalisation des contenus, l’affichage des vidéos et la mesure d’audience. Aucun cookie ne sert à vous pister à des fins commerciales ou publicitaires.

ICOMOSTermes et conditions d’utilisation des témoins de navigateurs, ou « cookies »

ICOMOS
Termes et conditions d’utilisation des témoins de navigateurs, ou « cookies »