On June 15, 1996, US/ICOMOS will leave its long-time home at
Decatur House and occupy an office suite at the National Building
Museum, located in the Pension Building at Judiciary Square, NW,
in Washington, DC. We are grateful to Decatur House and the
National Trust for Historic Preservation for providing the
impressive setting on Lafayette Square, in Washington's premier
historic house museum, that US/ICOMOS has enjoyed for the past 14
years.
We are also
eager to move into our new space in another very different and
very distinctive historic building. We look forward to meeting all
our neighbors at the National Building Museum, where there are
many opportunities to be developed for cooperation. Members are
invited to visit us at the new offices when in Washington and the
National Building Museum. Our new address is:
US/ICOMOS
401 F Street, NW Room #331
Washington, DC 20001
US/ICOMOS telephone numbers will remain the same: Gustavo F.
Araoz, AIA, Executive Director: 202-842-1859; Ellen M. Delage,
Program Director: 202-842- 1862; Switchboard: 202-842-1866; Fax:
202-842-1861.
|
An article in this space two years ago, ICOMOS
in the Information Age, (Newsletter No.3 [1994]) previewed some of
the opportunities that new communication technologies offer to ICOMOS. In
the intervening months, extensive coverage by the news media have made the
"Internet" and the "World Wide Web" (WWW) into popular
topics of conversation. Scores of preservation organizations in the U.S.
and abroad have established WWW sites. Sites are particularly valuable
where they collaborate, using joint resources to create an informal
network of hypertext links, a WWW feature allowing related
documents to be connected. Such an informal network has evolved among
several organizations dealing with cultural resource protection. This
network may become the prototype for the proposed World Heritage
Information Network (WHIN, see box) now being developed between the World
Heritage Centre and its advisory bodies (ICOMOS, IUCN, ICCROM). This
article highlights the contributors to and the resources of this network
that may be of interest to US/ICOMOS members 1.
US/ICOMOS. <http://www.icomos.org/usicomos/>
US/ICOMOS' homepage includes information about the organization, events
and all newsletters
since 1993. A "search engine" allows the reader to search
for words or phrases. Although no photographs are included, the
newsletters are illustrated in other ways, with imbedded links to projects
and organizations mentioned in the text. Words in boldface [or
underlined] in this article represent hypertext links in the online issue
of this newsletter.
US/ICOMOS MISSION STATEMENT
US/ICOMOS fosters heritage conservation and historic preservation
at the national and international levels through education and
training, international exchange of people and information,
technical assistance, documentation, advocacy and other activities
consistent with the goals of ICOMOS and through collaboration with
other organizations.
US/ICOMOS
membership includes professionals- practitioners, supporters and
organizations committed to the protection, preservation and
conservation of the world's cultural heritage. US/ICOMOS is the
U.S. National Committee of the International Council on Monuments
and Sites (ICOMOS), the international nongovernmental organization
dedicated to the preservation and conservation of the world's
heritage.
US/ICOMOS NEWSLETTER
The US/ICOMOS Newsletter is published by US/ICOMOS six times per
year as a benefit of membership. Members are urged to submit brief
articles with illustrations and editorial items for inclusion in
the Newsletter. Materials will be edited by US/ICOMOS as
appropriate. There are no submission deadlines; items will be used
as space and time permit.
Contributors are
solely responsible for the facts and opinions stated herein, and
publication in this Newsletter does not constitute an official
endorsement by US/ICOMOS.
Please send
submissions and any inquiries to the Editor, US/ICOMOS Newsletter,
1600 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006.
|
World Heritage Sites in
the United States. <http://www.cr.nps.gov/worldheritage/>
The web site is a joint project of the National Park Service and
US/ICOMOS. The site includes links and descriptive text about all the
United States sites on the World Heritage List.
National Center for
Preservation Technology and Training (NCPTT). <http://www.cr.nps.gov/ncptt/>
The new web pages are a graphical interface to the extensive materials in
the Internet gopher
established by the Center a year ago. The NCPTT now includes the subject
guide, Internet Resources
for Heritage Conservation, Historic Preservation and Archaeology
<http://www.cr.nps.gov/ncptt/irg/>. For two years a feature of the
ICOMOS site, this resource guide was transferred in March 1996 to the NCPTT,
which now maintains it. Included in its listings are web and gopher
addresses of most national (and many international) organizations. For
cultural resource issues, this is a better guide than the more visible
Internet subject guides such as Yahoo!
or the WWW Virtual Library.
International Council on Monuments
and Sites (ICOMOS). <http://www.icomos.org/> The homepage of
ICOMOS, originally developed by ICOMOS
Canada, contains most of the formal ICOMOS documents, including the Venice
Charter (in three languages); the Declaration
of Amsterdam, and close to three dozen other international instruments
and agreements. Both National Committees (to date: US, Canada, Argentina)
and International Specialized Committees (Wood,
Photogrammetry) are
represented. Discussions have been taking place with the Paris Secretariat
about ways the site can continue to expand.
World Heritage
Centre, UNESCO. <http://www.unesco.org./whc/> The
intergovernmental secretariat for the World
Heritage Convention has maintained its own web page array since early
1995. The site includes a hypertext version of the World
Heritage List, the text of the Convention,
Operational Guidelines,
and specialized reports such as the Nara
Document on Authenticity and the Report of the Asia-Pacific
Workshop on Cultural Landscapes. In the near future, watch for the
significant expansion of this site, which, together with other partners in
the World Heritage Information Network, will be expanding its offerings.
International Centre for the Study
of the Preservation and the Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM).
<http://www.iccrom.org/> ICCROM is now rapidly developing this group
of web pages, including course descriptions, reports, and a new
initiative, Integrated Territorial and Urban Conservation.
Cultural
Protection Treaties and Other International Instruments.
<http://www.tufts.edu/departments/fletcher/multi/cultural.html> The
site, a part of the larger Multilaterals Project at the Fletcher School of
Law & Diplomacy, includes the full www texts of most Conventions since
the 1935 Roerich
Pact and links to the texts in other sites listed here.
Other sites of international interest:
Archaeological
Resources Guide for Europe (ARGE). WWW page array with a rich
collection of links relating to European archaeological investigations.
<http://www.bham.ac.uk/BUFAU/Projects/EAW/>
[Australia] Australian
Heritage Commission. <http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage>
[Canada] Parks Canada.
<http://parkscanada.pch.gc.ca/>
[European Union] The Raphaël
www site outlines the EU's "Community action programme in the field
of cultural heritage." <http://www.cec.lu/en/comm/dg10/culture/en/heritage/raphael.html>
[Document has been relocated since the publication of the newsletter; ed.]
[France] Le Ministère de la Culture.
The oldest and still one of the most extensive Internet sites in the field
of cultural protection, the site includes a link to the new www database
for the Inventaire
Général, the inventory of immovable cultural property in France.
<http:/www.culture.fr>
[Japan] Kyushu
Machinami Archives. <http://www.miyazaki-mic.ac.jp/faculty/bdarling/machinami.html>
One of a growing number of Japanses web sites, Kyushu Archives describes
both the Japanese Preservation movement and its laws and the preservation
of Kyushu's cities, towns and villages.
[Netherlands] Culture
Heritage Protection in the Netherlands. <http://odin.let.rug.nl/CB/CBe_nl.htmll>
Pacific Asia Travel Association (PATA).
PATA is the "Voice of Pacific Area Tourism" and includes
virtually all nations between Pakistan and the United States. PATA's
activities include important initiatives on the Environment, Heritage and
"Values-Based Tourism." <http://www.pata.org>
[SE Asia] SEAMEO Regional
Centre for Archaeology and Fine Arts (SPAFA). Based in Bangkok,
SPAFA is a project of the Southeast Asian Ministers of Education
Organization (SEAMEO). The site includes an extensive schedule of upcoming
workshops and training activities. <http://www.seamo.org/spafa>
[United Kingdom] Royal Commission
on the Historical Monuments of England (RCHME). <http://www.rchme.gov.uk/>
[United States] Links to the Past,
the cultural resource programs of the National Park Service. It now
includes a link to the databases of the National Register Information
System (NRIS). <http://www.cr.nps.gov/>
For other sites, readers should consult the Internet
Resource Guide noted above. Of the many general-purpose Internet
search engines (e.g., Lycos, Infoseek, Yahoo, Excite, etc.), one of the
best is Alta Vista
<http://altavista.com/>. For more basic assistance, write to the
Committee on Communications, Information and Technology at ccit@world.std.com
or to US/ICOMOS for the Committee's publication, Internet Access...,
available in mid-May.
Peter H. Stott, Chair
US/ICOMOS Committee on Communications, Information and Technology
-----------------
1 Internet sites are identified by
their unique Internet address or "URL" (Universal Resource
Locator), usually beginning http://... No URL should have internal
spaces or concluding period (.).
The World Heritage Information Network (WHIN) is a partnership of
the UNESCO World Heritage Centre, its advisory bodies (ICOMOS,
IUCN and ICCROM), States Parties to the Convention and World
Heritage Properties all over the world. Using the World Wide Web,
electronic mail and other communications tools, the WHIN will
allow participants and the public greater access to information
about the World Heritage Convention and the properties it
protects. At a technical
meeting held at UNESCO headquarters in Paris last September,
participants agreed on a set of principles and recommendations
that should guide the network's development. The working document
adopted by the meeting was approved by the World Heritage
Committee at its annual meeting in Berlin in December 1995.
As adopted by
the Technical meeting, and subsequently refined by electronic
discussion list by the meeting participants, the WHIN will be
developed in stages. The first, prototype
stage, to be completed by the time of the World Heritage
Committee's Bureau meeting this June, will be the development of a
working prototype World Wide Web array with a working search
engine capable of querying all of the partner world wide web
pages. The World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) isproviding
the technical expertise for the search engine's development.
Further news of the WHIN will be reported in the next newsletter. P.S.
|
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
US/ICOMOS ANNUAL MEETING, SAN ANTONIO, MARCH 31, 1996
US/ICOMOS was pleased to act on one of the recommendations of its
Strategic Planning exercise of 1994-1995: namely, moving US/ICOMOS
activities beyond Washington. We were happy to meet in San Antonio; we
wish that more US/ICOMOS members had been able to join us there for our
Symposium on Authenticity and the opportunity to meet with other ICOMOS
colleagues, from Canada on the north to Argentina and Chile on the south.
The US/ICOMOS 1997 meeting will take place in Washington and is now
scheduled for April 12, a Saturday, as has been our practice in the past.
We hope that we will have a large and enthusiastic turn-out at that time
for our meeting in our new headquarters building at the National Building
Museum where we shall be moving during June. In the meantime, come to see
us there!
FUNDING
Many of us were taught as children that it wasn't nice to talk about
money. As adults and as preservationists, we are finding that many of us
talk about little else. Perhaps is all a part of the decline in civility.
It is certainly a part of the decline in the availability of public
funding. The perspective from inside the Beltway on historic preservation
funding as it relates to US/ICOMOS seems little changed from that which we
shared with US/ICOMOS members a year ago. The National Park Service
continues to be supportive of our efforts and is committed to increase its
level of funding for US/ICOMOS for FY 1997. The problems of course are
what will happen to Park Service funding from the Congress and further
whether FY 1997 will begin on October 1 or whether we shall see a repeat
of the delays and close-downs which occurred in connection with FY 1996
funding (unresolved as of late March at the time of this writing). The
State Department funding is still unresolved. Those funds are important to
us and make it possible for US/ICOMOS to realize some of its very basic
objectives as an international cultural organization.
The Annual Meeting
provides an opportunity for looking at what we are doing, who we are,
where we have been and where we are going.
First of all, at the
September 1995 Board meeting, I set forth a series of specific
administrative goals for the organization for the next three years. I
think that they are worth restating here:
- A financially stable US/ICOMOS through effective management and a
combination of financial development, membership development and other
means.
- A qualified staff with professional and administrative support
appropriate to the programs and activities that need to be undertaken.
- Programs that truly serve the needs of the national and
international preservation communities.
- Partnerships with organizations and committees inside and outside of
US/ICOMOS in order to heighten program effectiveness.
Several months ago I asked that the US/ICOMOS Mission Statement be
included in or on every document that comes out of the organization and
its committees. Members as well as the public need to be reminded of what
we do and who we are.
WHAT DO WE DO? The Mission Statement tell us that:
US/ICOMOS fosters heritage conservation and historic preservation at
the national and international levels through education and training,
international exchange of people and information, technical assistance
and documentation, advocacy and other activities consistent with the
goals of ICOMOS and through collaboration with other organizations.
WHO ARE WE? According to the Mission adopted by our
membership:
US/ICOMOS membership includes professionals, practitioners,
supporters and organizations committed to the protection, preservation
and conservation of the world's cultural heritage. US/ICOMOS is the U.S.
National Committee of ICOMOS, the international nongovernmental
organization dedicated to the preservation and conservation of the
world's cultural heritage.
It seems appropriate to look at the Goals that we have established for
ourselves as a result of our Strategic Planning process completed at the
beginning of 1995, 15 months ago and to ask how we have responded to those
Goals and where we might be doing a better job.
In my church we confess
every Sunday that "we have left undone things that we ought to have
done." I am afraid that that applies to things that happen during the
week and to US/ICOMOS as well. At the same time, I was told at a recent
meeting that one part of planning is "deciding what you are not
going to do." We need to bear that in mind as we develop our agenda
for the year and the years to come.
Let's look at the Goals
and some of the strategies that have been proposed for addressing those
Strategic Goals and let's see what we should be doing and what we might
well leave undone until a kinder gentler world or perhaps the millennium
appears.
GOAL 1: TO STIMULATE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AWARENESS ABOUT
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CULTURAL HERITAGE AND TO ADVOCATE ITS PRESERVATION
AS PART OF A BROAD CONCERN FOR THE WORLD'S ENVIRONMENT.
According to the
Strategies we have adopted for accomplishing that Goal, what should
we be doing?
- We should be serving our own membership better.
- We should be doing a better job of communicating with all audiences
through a variety of media and means.
- We should look to the level of public relations that we can or could
provide.
- We certainly should be taking steps to stimulate professional
exchanges.
- And we need to work harder to get out the message concerning the
World Heritage Convention.
GOAL 2: TO PROMOTE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE PRESERVATION
OF THE WORLD'S CULTURAL HERITAGE.
In recognition of the
Strategies which US/ICOMOS has adopted for accomplishing that goal,
- Are we doing enough to inform and serve the US/ICOMOS membership and
other constituencies concerning such standards?
- Should we be doing more to communicate information concerning those
standards to professionals and to the public?
- Should we be using our national specialized committee programs to
promote understanding and the adoption of those international
standards?
- Should US/ICOMOS seek to ensure the incorporation of those standards
in World Heritage monitoring efforts?
- What priority should US/ICOMOS assign its efforts to ensure the
adoption of and adherence to international standards?
GOAL 3: TO INCREASE THE LEVEL OF PRESERVATION SKILLS NATIONALLY
AND INTERNATIONALLY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL NETWORKS AND THE EXCHANGE OF
INFORMATION, TRAINING AND EXPERTISE.
In terms of the
Strategies that were proposed for US/ICOMOS,
- Have we done enough to recruit a highly professional and skilled
membership?
- What priority should US/ICOMOS assign to efforts to use every means
possible to spread the word concerning the need to use skilled
professionals and professional techniques in the protection of the
cultural heritage?
GOAL 4: TO ADVOCATE INCREASED GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR
INTERNATIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE LAWS, AGREEMENTS AND POLICIES AND TO
ADVISE ON THEIR DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION.
In terms of the
strategies that were proposed at the conclusion of the Strategic Plan,
- What priority has US/ICOMOS assigned to the realization of public
policy issues relating to the protection of the cultural heritage? Is
that the appropriate priority?
- Has US/ICOMOS assigned appropriate priority to the need for
stimulating public awareness about policy issues relating to
preservation and conservation?
- Should US/ICOMOS go farther than it has in terms of developing its
role as an advocate on the development of policies, legislation,
domestic and international laws and agreements and relating to
international cultural heritage issues?
GOAL 5: TO DEVELOP AND EXPAND RESOURCES COMMITTED TO THE
PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION OF THE CULTURAL HERITAGE.
- What priority should US/ICOMOS assign to its efforts to recruit
individual and institutional members with financial means and access
to those with influence in both the public and private sectors?
- What priority should US/ICOMOS give to encouraging membership
renewal and upgrading?
- Has US/ICOMOS assigned appropriate priority to possible special
programs designed to attract potential donors?
- Has US/ICOMOS been sufficiently energetic in its efforts to identify
itself as an important player in preservation and the World Heritage
Convention in particular?
- Has US/ICOMOS established (in the words of the Goals Statement)
"...a clearly identifiable fund-raising program" with
financial and program targets, with a database of potentially
supportive decision makers, individuals, corporations and foundations?
GOAL 6: TO BUILD A PROACTIVE, FINANCIALLY SECURE ORGANIZATION
THAT IS RESPONSIVE TO A BROAD CONSTITUENCY.
- Should US/ICOMOS do more to establish a profile of its ideal
membership?
- Should US/ICOMOS do more to involve its membership in its
operations? How? Where?
In conclusion, I like to think of myself as a realist and I like to
think of US/ICOMOS as an organization that has a sense of reality as to
what it is doing, what it should be doing, and what it might do better. I
hardly need remind you that these are not your normal times and that
reality means different things to different constituencies.
Where were we when we
established US/ICOMOS Goals just 15 months ago?
US/ICOMOS began its
strategic planning before the birth of the Contract with America (although
it was more than a gleam in the eye of its supporters) when we were busily
identifying what US/ICOMOS should be doing and, equally importantly, what
we should not be doing. In government, continuing resolutions were
a concern, not a way of life; government shutdowns were conceivable but
hardly probable.
The facts of life in
Washington, of preservation life and of life at US/ICOMOS have changed a
great deal in a very short time. However, US/ICOMOS' Mission remains very
clear and very appropriate; its Goals seem appropriate; its Strategies
seem realistic.
As of now, I would
suggest that what US/ICOMOS must do in the coming year and in the years
ahead is:
- Establish priorities for the organization as a whole and for tasks
that we will seek to accomplish.
- Reconsider the means available to us and seek to expand and develop
the existing means, and to go beyond them to identify new means for
accomplishing our objectives.
- To plan: not just to plan what we are going to do but to plan what
we are not going to do and to resist the temptation to do too much,
just as we resist any suggestion of doing too little.
- To stick with the Mission: to remind ourselves and the US/ICOMOS
membership of it constantly. If it is not appropriate, to think long
and hard about changing it þ how, why and where.
Once more, I would like to remind you of the Mission of US/ICOMOS as
adopted in 1995:
US/ICOMOS fosters heritage conservation and historic preservation at the
national and international levels through education and training,
international exchange of people and information, technical assistance
and documentation, advocacy and other activities consistent with the
goals of ICOMOS and through collaboration with other organizations.
Let's get to work.
Ann Webster Smith, US/ICOMOS Chairman
Members attending these and other international programs should
please inform US/ICOMOS of their participation.
- June 5-8, 1996. ICOMOS Executive Committee Meeting, at ICOMOS
headquarters, Paris, France.
- October 29-31, 1996. International Conference on Tourism
and Heritage Management, in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. An
international conference sponsored by the several government
Ministries of Indonesia and UNESCO to promote an interdisciplinary
discussion on tourism and heritage management from among
representatives of anthropology, archaeology, sociology and tourism
planning and management. The discussions will focus on key issues of
concern to tourism experts, heritage site managers, archaeologists,
decision makers and private tourism industry representatives. Themes
& Issues of the conference are: Heritage Site Management (access
& control, carrying capacity, hawkers & souvenirs, human
resource training, site preservation, conservation principles and
ethics, marketing issues); Problems of Interpretation (guidelines,
multi-media & technology issues, signage, publications, site
presentation, authenticity and quality issues); Heritage & Living
Communities (local community involvement, conflicts & competing
interests, developing vs. developed countries, colonial heritage).
International Secretariat: 2 Sandalwood, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5NZ,
UK, tel/fax: 44-1483-564498, e-mail: msp1wn@surrey.ac.uk
|