|
New Guidelines
to accompany the Revised Burra Charter (1999) will be available
soon. The following Guidelines apply to the previous version of
the Charter and are not directly compatible with the Revised Charter.
|
|
|
Australia
ICOMOS
Guidelines to the Burra charter (1988):
procedures for undertaking studies and reports
|
|
|
These guidelines
for the preparation of professional studies and reports were adopted
by the Australian national committee of the International Council
on Monuments and Sites (Australia ICOMOS) on 23 April 1988. They
should be read in conjunction with the Burra
charter.
|
|
|
Contents
1.0
Preface
2.0 Agreements between client and practitioner
3.0 Responsibility for content of report
4.0 Draft report
5.0 Urgent action
6.0 Additional work
7.0 Recommendations for further investigations
8.0 Exhibition and comment
9.0 Adoption and review of report
10.0 Further evidence
11.0 Accessibility of information
|
|
1.0
|
Preface
These
guidelines make recommendations
about professional practice in the preparation of the studies and
reports within the terms of the Burra charter.
Attention
is also drawn to the advice about ethical, procedural and legal
matters provided in the practice notes issued by various professional
bodies.
|
|
2.0
|
Agreements
between client and practitioner
Before undertaking
a study or report, the client and the practitioner should agree
upon:
(a) the
extent of the task, for example, up to the preparation of a statement
of significance, up to the preparation of a statement of conservation
policy or up to the preparation of a strategy for implementation;
(b) the
boundaries of the place;
(c) any
aspect which requires intensive investigation;
(d) the
dates for the commencement of the task, submission of the draft
report and submission of the final report;
(c) the
fee and the basis upon which fees and disbursements will be paid;
(f) the
use of any joint consultant, subconsultant or other practitioner
with special expertise;
(g) the
basis for any further investigation which may be required, for example,
within the terms of 7.0 below or section
3.3 of Guidelines to the Burra charter: conservation policy;
(h) the
representative of the client to whom the practitioner will be responsible
in the course of the task;
(i) the
sources, material or services to be supplied by the client including
previous studies or reports;
(j) any
requirements for the format or reproduction of the report;
(k) the
number of copies of the report to be supplied at each stage;
(l) copyright
and confidentiality;
(m) how
the authorship will be cited;
(n) the
condition under which the report may be published or distributed
by the client, the practitioner or others;
(o) the
procedure for any required exhibition of the report;
(p) the
basis for comment upon the report and any consequent amendment;
(q) the
responsibility for effecting archival storage in accordance with
Article 28 of the Burra charter.
|
|
3.0
|
Responsibility
for content of report
The
content of the report is the responsibility of the practitioner.
The report may not be amended without the agreement of the practitioner.
|
|
4.0
|
Draft
report
It
is useful for the report to be presented to the client in draft
form to ensure that it is understood and so that the practitioner
may receive the client's comments.
|
|
5.0
|
Urgent
action
If
the practitioner believes that urgent action may be necessary to
avert a threat to the fabric involving, for example, stability or
security, the practitioner should immediately advise the client
to seek specialist advice.
|
|
6.0
|
Additional
work
Where
it becomes clear that some aspect of the task will require more
investigation or more expertise than has been allowed within the
budget or the terms of the agreement, the practitioner should advise
the client immediately.
|
|
7.0
|
Recommendations
for further investigations
In respect of
major unresolved aspects of cultural significance, conservation
policy or of strategies for implementation of conservation policy,
recommendations for further investigation should be made only where:
(a) the
client has been informed of the need for such investigation at the
appropriate stage and it has been impossible to have it undertaken
within the budget and time constraints of the task;
(b) further
information is anticipated as a result of intervention in the fabric
which would not be proper at this stage, but which will become appropriate
in the future.
Such
recommendations should indicate what aspects of cultural significance,
conservation policy or implementation might be assisted by such
study.
|
|
8.0
|
Exhibition
and comment
The
report for any project of public interest should be exhibited in
order that interested bodies and the public may comment and reasonable
time should be allowed for the receipt and consideration of comment.
Where public exhibition is not appropriate, comment should be sought
from relevant individuals, organisations and specialists.
|
|
9.0
|
Adoption
and review of report
Recommendations
should be made for the formal adoption of the report and for any
subsequent review.
|
|
10.0
|
Further
evidence
If
after the completion of the report further evidence is revealed,
for example, by intervention in the fabric or information from other
sources, it is desirable for this evidence to be referred to the
original practitioner so that the report may be amended if necessary.
|
|
11.0
|
Accessibility
of information
All
material relating to the cultural significance of the place should
be made readily available to increase the common pool of knowledge.
Publication by the client and/or practitioner should be encouraged.
|
|
|
©
Australia ICOMOS 1988
|
|